Washington Decides, We Pay
With the election of President Obama last fall, climate change legislation became a priority issue in Washington. Even with the economic crisis that the administration has to deal with, there is still a lot of attention being paid to how to go about reducing the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions believed by many to be the cause of global warming.
Remember from my previous articles on global warming that a little over half the electricity generated in the U.S. is from coal with about 20% coming from natural gas. Also know that coal emits about 1.6 times as much carbon dioxide as natural gas. So then, any legislation dealing with the emission of carbon dioxide is going to have coal in the bull’s eye.
Also keep in mind that Bowie-Cass’s generation mix is about 60% coal, 30% natural gas and 10% hydropower. Laws passed that impact the price of coal generation are going to impact us more than most.
So how are these laws designed to reduce the production of carbon dioxide going to work? There are two basis programs that are being proposed. One is called cap-and-trade and the other is a carbon tax. Let’s look at the carbon tax program first. This program is quite straightforward. It would set a tax rate per ton of CO2 emitted. Most legislation has the tax rate increasing with time to encourage the development of generation sources that emit less CO2. One of the advantages of this program is that the amount of the tax could be known and planned for in advance.
The other program that is proposed in legislation to reduce the production of CO2 is the cap-and-trade program. This program would put a limit, or cap, on how much CO2 could be released. Anything over that amount would have to have a matching allowance purchased from generators that produce less CO2 than the cap amount. These allowances would be traded in an auction system. The price of the allowances would be set by supply and demand and could vary greatly from one time period to another. This cap-and-trade program is the preferred program of the Obama administration and is included in his 2010 budget.
Glen English, the CEO of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA) had this to say in a recent letter to President Obama. “NRECA strongly objects to the proposal in your administration’s budget to auction emission allowances to the highest bidder in a cap-and -trade program…. Such a program would only serve as a backdoor, variable tax on consumers. If the government needs to raise revenue to fund important national priorities, those taxes should be set by the government and collected by the IRS, not set by Wall Street to be collected by utilities.”
From a personal standpoint, I agree with Mr. English. I would rather see my elected representatives stand up and come in the front door and tell me what they need rather than pass legislation that sneaks in the backdoor to do the same thing. Regardless of which program ends up in the final legislation, I think we can be certain of this; it is going to result in a significant increase in electricity rates.
Again, we want to encourage you to make your concerns about the affordability of electricity known to your elected representatives. You can do that by going to the Our Energy, Our Future website at http://www.ourenergy.coop/.
Who knows when the legislation will be passed and become law. The time to make your voice heard is now. In the political arena, two things are of supreme importance, money and votes. The cooperative program may not have the most dollars but it does have a lot of voices. Now is the time to let Washington hear us on this issue.

The Bowie-Cass Electric Cooperative board of Directors recently approved several changes to the By-Laws of the Cooperative. These changes allow members to vote for directors by Mail-In Ballot and affect the nomination process to become a director.